UCLouvain Error Editor Version 2 (UCLEEv2) Now Available!
We are very pleased to announce that Version 2 of the UCLouvain Error Editor (UCLEEv2) has just been released under a Creative Commons Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The program can be downloaded from UCLouvain’s Open Educational Resources platform using the following link: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12279/968
The software, which was developed at the Centre for English Corpus Linguistics (CECL) (Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium), …
[View More]aims to facilitate the insertion of error tags and corrections into learner texts, as well as their subsequent processing. It comes with the following functions:
* Tagset selection
* Menu-driven tag insertion
* Tag consistency checking
* Concordancing
* Error statistics
* Automatic exercise generator.
By default UCLEEv2 uses the freely available tagset described in the Louvain Error Tagging Manual Version 2.0<https://cdn.uclouvain.be/groups/cms-editors-cecl/cecl-papers/Granger%20et%2…> (Granger, Swallow & Thewissen 2022), but users can also design their own tagset and work with it in UCLEEv2. The initial version of the tagset was developed to tag the first version of the International Corpus of Learner English (ICLE) (Granger et al. 2002) and further refined in the context of the two subsequent versions of the ICLE (Granger et al. 2009 and 2020). The various versions have been used in many other learner corpus projects internationally. UCLEEv2 includes a built-in converter which allows users to work on texts tagged with previous versions of UCLEE.
The program is accompanied by a detailed user guide<https://cdn.uclouvain.be/groups/cms-editors-cecl/cecl-papers/UCLEE%20user%2…> (Granger, Swallow & Thewissen 2023).
We hope that the program will prove useful to researchers interested in assessing the accuracy of L2 writing, investigating errors produced by specific learner groups and designing materials focused on their attested difficulties.
Feedback welcome!
Sylviane Granger, Helen Swallow and Jennifer Thewissen
[View Less]
Dear Ada,
I agree that lemmatisation is a construct and is not a universal method for linguistic analyses, but I don't understand why it is imperative that I wean myself from using lemmas.
What is it that restricts my freedom to invent the lemma (a non-universal construct) AĞAÇ-, for example, to refer to the one and only "meaningful thing" that is common to the very many (theoretically infinite, practically probably around 10,000) strings including ağaç, ağacı, ağaca, ağaçlar, ağacımızdaki, ağ…
[View More]açlandırılabilmesinden, ağaçsızlaşmasını, etc. etc.? How (and why) am I supposed to talk about that very large set without using a label for it?
Best,
Orhan Bilgin
On 17 Oct 2023 18:36, Ada Wan via Corpora <corpora(a)list.elra.info> wrote:
This email originated outside the University. Check before clicking links or attachments.
Dear Christian
Re your PS:
one doesn't need to debate the use/future of lemmatization, though I'd welcome such as part of scholarship. For those experienced in matters in/of Linguistics, it should be clear that lemmatization was simply a cconstruct, a entry-level philological exercise (esp. for those from Computer Science with less of a background in Linguistics and language(s)). It has been sad that some have picked up the habit of using lemmatization as a heuristic (though for what, specifically?) and might have become, apparently, too addicted to it to let it go. It is imperative that one weans themselves from such habit.
Methods for linguistic morphology, e.g. (morphological) parsing or stemming, are not a universal decomposition scheme, nor a universal method for language/linguistic analyses. Also important is to bear in mind is that neither linguistic morphology nor lemmas/lemmata doesn't/don't have that long of a history.
Thanks for being open-minded enough to read this far.
Best
Ada
[View Less]
Dear Colleague,
We invite you to submit your contribution to the upcoming December 2023 Edition
of the SIGIR Forum, the official newsletter of the ACM Special Interest
Group on Information Retrieval (SIGIR). The SIGIR Forum consists of two
issues (June, December). It serves as a medium for disseminating general
information and opinions on matters of interest to the IR community,
conference and workshop reports, papers and book reviews, and Ph.D.
dissertation abstracts.
*** Call for …
[View More]Contributions for the December 2023 issue ***
We invite contributions to the following categories, including:
- Reports of IR-related conferences and workshops: Reports from the
chairpersons of IR-related workshops (such as the satellite workshops
of SIGIR, JCDL, or CIKM, or other workshops such as NTCIR, INEX) or
IR-related conferences other than SIGIR (such as ECIR, HLT, CHIIR, SPIRE,
or TREC);
- Papers from IR-related invited talks which are not published in full in
the relevant conference proceedings;
- Papers describing new public infrastructures for IR research, such as
in-depth descriptions of newly available test collections, newly available
open-source or public domain IR software of particular relevance, new
evaluation campaigns, etc.;
- Papers about funding initiatives, industry trends, connections between
research and industry, legal issues that are of potential interest to the
IR community at large;
- Any paper that, while of general interest to the IR community, is
non-technical, and because of this would be unsuitable for publication in
technical publishing forums such as the SIGIR Annual Conference;
- Book reviews, bibliographies of general interest to the IR community;
- Abstracts of recently published Ph.D. theses of interest to the general
IR community.
Note: Unless specifically stated, contents of the SIGIR Forum do not
represent the official position of SIGIR or ACM. Contributions to
the Forum are unrefereed papers unless otherwise indicated. The editorial
board may desk-reject papers if they are out of scope. From June 2020
onwards, the SIGIR Forum newsletter is continuing only online.
*** Important dates for the June 2023 Edition ***
*- 13 November 2023: Deadline for contributions*
- December 2023: Online publication
*** Submission Instructions ***
Kindly see http://sigir.org/forum/ for details on previous issues,
template, and submission instructions and checklist.
For inquiries about contributions, please contact the editors at
editors_SIGIR(a)acm.org.
Tirthankar Ghosal (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US)
Josiane Mothe (IRIT, Univ. de Toulouse)
Julián Urbano (Delft University of Technology)
--
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
*Tirthankar Ghosal*
Scientist
National Center for Computational Sciences (NCCS)
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, United States
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
[View Less]
The next meeting of the Edge Hill Corpus Research Group will take place online (via MS Teams) on Thursday 9 November 2023, 2-3 pm (UK time).
Topics: Discourse-Oriented Corpus Studies, Immigration
Speaker: Katia Adimora (Edge Hill University, UK)
Title: Towards more positive portrayals of Mexican immigration/immigrants in the American and Mexican press
Abstract:
Various studies (e.g., Galindo Gómez, 2019; Taylor, 2009; Gabrielatos and Baker, 2008) have explored press attitudes towards …
[View More]immigration/ immigrants in different countries. To analyse the attitudes towards Mexican immigration/immigrants in the American and Mexican press, two specialised corpora of 30 million words were created. The American corpus includes more than 12,000 articles from six American newspapers: The New York Times, The Washington Post, USA Today, Los Angeles Times, The Arizona Republic and Chicago Tribune. The corpus articles were published between 16 June 2015, which marked the start of Trump's presidential campaign, and 20 January 2021, the date of Biden's presidential inauguration. The Mexican corpus includes more than 20,000 articles from six Mexican newspapers, published during Trump's era: El Universal, Elimparcial.com, Reforma, El Norte, Lacronica.com and Mural.
Even though the negative discourse prosodies seem to dominate newspaper discourses, this study argues that the attitudes towards Mexican immigration/immigrants in American and, especially, in Mexican newspapers are not as negative as expected. The results show that two-third (66%) of the instances in American corpus newspapers and more than three quarters (78%) of the instances in Mexican corpus newspapers express a positive perspective. However, among the most frequent negative attitudes in American and Mexican corpus newspapers is the description of immigrants as criminals (20% and 18%). The diachronic frequency analysis of the attitudes towards 'immigration' and 'immigrant(s)' shows correlations between socio-political events and press discourses, which might contribute to public opinion about Mexican immigration/immigrants. For instance, Trump's family separation policy might have ignited empathy towards immigrants in the corpus newspapers.
You can register here:
https://store.edgehill.ac.uk/conferences-and-events/conferences/events/edge…
The EHU CRG programme for 2023-24 is here: https://sites.edgehill.ac.uk/crg/next
________________________________
Edge Hill University<http://ehu.ac.uk/home/emailfooter>
Modern University of the Year, The Times and Sunday Times Good University Guide 2022<http://ehu.ac.uk/tef/emailfooter>
University of the Year, Educate North 2021/21
________________________________
This message is private and confidential. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and remove it from your system. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Edge Hill or associated companies. Edge Hill University may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security and business communications during staff absence.<http://ehu.ac.uk/itspolicies/emailfooter>
[View Less]
**** We apologize for the multiple copies of this email. In case you are
already registered to the next webinar, you do not need to register
again. ****
Dear coleague,
We are happy to announce the next webinar in the Language Technology
webinar series organized by the HiTZ research center (Basque Center for
Language Technology, http://hitz.eus). You can check the videos of
previous webinars and the schedule for upcoming webinars here:
http://www.hitz.eus/webinars
Next webinar:
* *…
[View More]Speaker*: Emily M. Bender (University of Washington)
* *Title*: Meaning making with artificial interlocutors and risks of
language technology
* *Date*: Nov 2, 2023, 16:00 CET
* *Summary*: Humans make sense of language in context, bringing to
bear their own understanding of the world including their model of
their interlocutor's understanding of the world. In this talk, I
will explore various potential risks that arise when we as humans
bring this sense-making capacity to interactions with artificial
interlocutors. That is, I will ask what happens in conversations
where one party has no (or extremely limited) access to meaning and
all of the interpretative work rests with the other, and briefly
explore what this entails for the design of language technology.
* *Bio*: Emily M. Bender is a Professor of Linguistics and an Adjunct
Professor in the School of Computer Science and the Information
School at the University of Washington, where she has been on the
faculty since 2003. Her research interests include multilingual
grammar engineering, computational semantics, and the societal
impacts of language technology. In 2022 she was elected as a Fellow
of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
* *Upcoming webinars: * Heng Ji (February 1, 2024)
* Smaranda Muresan (March 7, 2024)
* Ralf Schlüter (May 2, 2024)
* Marco Baroni (June 6, 2024)
Check past and upcoming webinars at the following url:
http://www.hitz.eus/webinars If you are interested in participating,
please complete this registration form:
http://www.hitz.eus/webinar_izenematea
If you cannot attend this seminar, but you want to be informed of the
following HiTZ webinars, please complete this registration form instead:
http://www.hitz.eus/webinar_info
Best wishes,
HiTZ Zentroa
[View Less]
https://sig.llmsecurity.net/
We're proud to announce a new research special interest group, SIGSEC, to
cover work on LLM and NLP security. SIGSEC is part of the Association for
Computational Linguistics (www.aclweb.org).
We host regular talks on NLP & LLM Security, a mailing list for people
interested in NLP & LLM security, and an annual research workshop.
The ACL Special Group on NLP Security exists to:
* provide infrastructure and community for those many ACL members working
in …
[View More]NLP Security;
* establish a serious research body that represents NLP and ACL interests
in the burgeoning field of LLM and NLP security; and
* bridge the Information Security and Computational Linguistics
communities, which is a link already actively being pursued by the
Information Security community.
Membership is free, and there's an exciting talks series. The video links
are posted on https://sig.llmsecurity.net/talks/. We start with:
* Thursday November 2nd, 10.00 ET / 15.00 CET - Text Embeddings Reveal
(Almost) As Much As Text - John X. Morris
* Thursday November 9th, 11.00 ET / 17.00 CET - LLM-Deliberation:
Evaluating LLMs with Interactive Multi-Agent Negotiation Games - Sahar
Abdelnabi
* Thursday November 23rd, 11.00 ET / 17.00 CET - Privacy Side Channels in
Machine Learning Systems - Edoardo Debenedetti
All talks present cutting-edge research on LLM security vulnerabilities and
assessment methods.
Join us here! https://sig.llmsecurity.net/join/
We look forward to welcoming you.
SIGSEC President: Leon Derczynski, ITU Copenhagen / NVIDIA Corp
SIGSEC Secretary: Muhao Chen, University of Southern California
SIGSEC Expert Advisor: Jekaterina Novikova, AI Risk and Vulnerability
Alliance / Cambridge Cognition
[View Less]
*Final CFP (EXTENDED DEADLINE) for RATIO-24: The 1st International
Conference on Robust Argumentation Machines (RATIO-24) will take place
from June 5th-7th, 2024, in Bielefeld, Germany. *
https://ratio-conference.net <https://ratio-conference.net>
In recent years, we have witnessed significant advances in our ability
to develop approaches that support the automated analysis,
summarization, aggregation, retrieval and ranking of arguments exchanged
“in the wild” at large scale. By "in …
[View More]the wild" we mean arguments
exchanged on the web in debate portals or other online formats where
users share opinions and viewpoints on topics relevant to them. Argument
analysis methods have indeed reached a level of maturity and robustness
that make them applicable to the analysis of real online debates, to
find the main arguments exchanged, to summarize and group arguments, or
even to automatically generate arguments to present different viewpoints
and perspectives.
We call for submissions of original research work on the following topics:
*
automatic semantic analysis of arguments, including tasks such as
stance detection, keypoint identification, attack/support
classification, etc.
*
analysis of arguments in discourse and dialogue
*
automatic synthesis and generation of arguments
*
summarization of arguments
*
argument retrieval
*
methods for predicting argument quality
*
ranking of arguments according to, e.g., quality
*
methods for rephrasing and repurposing arguments
*
inferring the frame, viewpoint or perspective of an argument
*
common sense knowledge in the automated analysis of arguments
*
scalable reasoning methods for arguments
*
applications of argument analysis in domains such as political
discourse, law, science, education, finance, social sciences, etc.
Papers will be peer-reviewed and published by Springer in the LNCS series.
Two types of papers will be accepted:
*
Long Papers(up to 15 pages including references): Description of
substantive and original research.
*
Short Papers(up to 8 pages including references): Description of
work in progress or original research contribution of limited scope.
Papers should be submitted via Easychair:
https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=ratio24
<https://easychair.org/conferences/?conf=ratio24>
Important dates (NOTE THE EXTENDED DEADLINES)
Abstract submission deadline: *November 10th, 2023*
Full paper submission deadline: *November 24th 2023*
Notification of Acceptance: *February 2nd, 2024*
Camera-ready version: *March 1st, 2024*
Conference Chairs:
Philipp Cimiano (CITEC, Bielefeld University)
Anette Frank (University of Heidelberg)
Michael Kohlhase (University of Erlangen-Nürnberg)
Benno Stein (Bauhaus University Weimar)
Jürgen Ziegler (University Duisburg - Essen)
Invited Speakers:
Elena Cabrio (Université Côte d’Azur, Inria <http://www.unice.fr/>)
Yufang Hou (IBM Research Europe)
Henning Wachsmuth (Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Leibniz
University of Hannover)
Venue:
The conference will be held in Bielefeld, Germany at the Cognitive
Interaction Technology Center (CITEC).
All questions about submissions should be emailed to Philipp Cimiano:
cimiano(a)cit-ec.uni.bielefeld.de
--
Prof. Dr. Anette Frankhttp://www.cl.uni-heidelberg.de/~frank
Computational Linguistics Department email:frank@cl.uni-heidelberg.de
University of Heidelberg phone: +49-(0)6221/54-3247
Im Neuenheimer Feld 325 secr: +49-(0)6221/54-3245
69120 Heidelberg, Germany fax: +49-(0)6221/54-3242
[View Less]
Call for abstracts
COST Action CA21167 UniDive
2nd general meeting, University of Naples L’Orientale, Italy
7-9 February 2024
UniDive (https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA21167/) is a COST action, i.e. a
scientific network, dedicated to universality, diversity and idiosyncrasy
in language technology. It is structured around 4 Working Groups:
-
WG1: Corpus annotation
-
WG2: Lexicon-corpus interface
-
WG3: Multilingual and cross-lingual language technology
-
WG4: …
[View More]Quantifying and promoting diversity
The second general meeting of the action will take place on February 7-9,
2024 at the University of Naples L’Orientale in Italy. We invite UniDive WG
members
<https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA21167/#tabs+Name:Working%20Groups%20and%20Mem…>
to submit abstract proposals related to the scientific program of the WGs.
Proposals may describe diverse types of contributions, according to 3
different tracks:
-
Planned work
-
Work in progress
-
Complete work, also previously published
A proposal should be anonymous, written in English and submitted in pdf
only. It should include (on the title page) the list of the relevant WGs.
It should not exceed 2 pages, including figures and tables (bibliographic
references may go beyond the 2-page limit). If linguistic examples from
languages other than English are included, those should be glossed and
translated into English, and an extra half page is allowed for this
purpose.
For the sake of uniformity and easing the reviewers’ effort, we encourage
authors to use the following Overleaf Latex template:
https://www.overleaf.com/read/yqbpxcbjmjjw
Other formats (not necessarily Latex-based) can also be used, provided that
they conform to the following specifications: A4 paper, 11pt font, 1in
margins. The submission link will be announced soon.
The reviewing process is double-blind. The selection of proposals will be
done by UniDive Program Committee according to the following criteria:
-
relevance to UniDive and the work program of its Working Groups (see pp.
18-20 of the Memorandum of Understanding
<https://e-services.cost.eu/files/domain_files/CA/Action_CA21167/mou/CA21167…>
),
-
clarity
-
diversity of the languages covered by the workshop program
The selected proposals will be presented at the 2nd UniDive general meeting
as posters and/or oral presentations.
At least one author per selected proposal will be reimbursed for their
travel and stay.
Important dates
-
26 October 2023, Call for abstracts
-
24 November 2023, Submission deadline
-
15 December 2023, notification of acceptance
-
20 December 2023, communication of the names of the presenters
-
12 January 2024, Final versions of abstracts
-
7-9 February 2024, UniDive 2nd general meeting
The time zone for all deadlines is Anywhere on Earth (UTC-12). Due to the
tight schedule, no extension of the submission deadline is foreseen.
Johanna Monti
Third Mission Delegate
Full Professor in Foreign Languages Teaching
Specialised Translation
MT and CAT tools, Computational Linguistics
Chief Scientist of the UNIOR NLP Research Group
Department of Literary, Linguistic and Comparative Studies
University of Naples "L'Orientale"
Via Duomo, 219
80138 Napoli
tel. +39 081 6909913
http://docenti.unior.it/index2.php?user_id=jmonti&content_id_start=1
*Linkedin*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johanna-monti-03553310
*UNIOR NLP Research Group*:
http://docenti.unior.it/index2.php?content_id=26056&content_id_start=1
*Skype*: johanna5962
*Twitter*: @selena245
Monti J. (2019), Dalla Zairja alla traduzione automatica - Riflessioni
sulla traduzione nell'era digitale, Napoli: Loffredo Editore.
Mitkov, R., Monti, J., Pastor, G. C., & Seretan, V. (Eds.). (2018). *Multiword
units in machine translation and translation technology*(Vol. 341). John
Benjamins Publishing Company. (https://benjamins.com/catalog/cilt.341)
**************************************************
*Firma per destinare il tuo 5xmille all’Università L’Orientale e aiuta così
i nostri studenti a fare un’esperienza di studio o tirocinio
all’estero. Indica il C.F. 00297640633 nel riquadro*
*“Finanziamento della ricerca scientifica e della Università”*
[View Less]
Dear colleagues,
COMPTEXT is an international community of quantitative text analysis and
computational social science scholars in political science,
international relations and beyond. COMPTEXT 2024 in Amsterdam follows
in the footsteps of previous conferences in Budapest (2018), Tokyo
(2019) and Innsbruck (online, 2020), Dublin (2022), and Glasgow (2023).
COMPTEXT conferences offer ample opportunities to network with
computational scholars, to exchange technological knowledge of
…
[View More]computational methods, and to obtain useful feedback on ongoing research.
For COMPTEXT 2024 in Amsterdam we are seeking paper submissions that:
- rely on image, video, text or other digital trace data to study social
and political phenomena broadly construed
- propose or evaluate new computational methods or tools
- seek to make contributions at the intersection of social science and
computer science
We accept both substantive and methodological papers for presentation:
substantive papers may be on any studies in social sciences or
humanities that utilize computational methods; methodological papers may
describe new computational methods, tools and approaches. Note that
conference proceeding will not be published, as the conference format
follows social science practices.
In keeping with our tradition, ahead of the conference a series of
methods training tutorials will be held for registered participants.
Courses will be offered for both beginner and advanced level participants.
*Submission of Paper Abstracts:*
Abstracts of max. 250 words and three substantive and/or methods-related
keywords, should be submitted by *Wednesday 20 December 2023*.
Notifications of acceptance will be sent by *16 February, 2024*.
The registration deadline is *15 March, 2024*.
Please submit your paper at https://forms.gle/VrzhEzJEcTNdM3RN9
Please be advised that a conference fee will be charged for participants
with accepted papers.
The COMPTEXT 2024 Organising Committee consists of:
- Mariken A.C.G. van der Velden (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
- Roan Buma (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
- Alona O. Dolinsky (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
- Johannes Gruber (Universiteit van Amsterdam)
- Kasper Welbers (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)
- Miklós Sebők (Centre for Social Sciences, Budapest)
*Equality, Diversion, and Inclusion:*
COMPTEXT is committed to creating an inclusive conference where
diversity is celebrated, and everyone is afforded equality of
opportunity. We welcome applications from everyone, including those who
identify with any of the protected characteristics that are set out in
VU’s Equality, Diversity and Inclusion policy
(https://vu.nl/en/about-vu/more-about/diversity). We especially
encourage scholars from traditionally underrepresented groups, female
scholars, and early-career researchers to apply.
For more information, please visit our website:
http://www.comptextconference.org/
Questions related to COMPTEXT Amsterdam 2024 should be directed to
comptext2024(a)gmail.com.
Best regards,
The Organizers
[View Less]
Hi Ada,
Thank you for your reply.
I don't think it is possible to follow your advice to wean ourselves of the concept of a lemma and at the same time think of "a verb that can be conjugated", because that is precisely an example of what I would call a lemma.
I never claimed that anything exists beyond the reality of my mind. I only asked why I am not allowed to talk about things that can be conjugated / inflected etc. and to use the word "lemma" to refer to those things. You haven't answered …
[View More]that question.
Best,
Orhan
On 18 Oct 2023 17:49, Ada Wan <adawan919(a)gmail.com> wrote:
[To those who do not have shared interests on issues that pertain to Corpora-List matters, such as data/corpora and their handling which includes but is not limited to linguistic/NLP theories/methods (and the validity thereof): please disregard.]
Dear Orhan
Thanks for your interests in this discussion. I think it is high time that our community comes to a critical (re-)examination of (linguistic) morphology (and to address issues concerning reinterpretation and transition).
First of all, allow me to put my traditional grammarian hat on to get to your question more directly. You brought up an example of a morphological paradigm.
Now, as linguists or language professionals, we know that language is (re-)productive in nature. So, if you don't mind, we can do a thought experiment and go through this dialectically (pls note that I only check my emails about once a day on weekdays, however).
1. Let's think of a verb that does not yet exist (in any particular language(s) that you can think of or that you are used to). Would you mind conjugating it for me? How many patterns would you have? And what would the forms be like?
2. Where did you get the patterns/paradigm from? If you were able to come up with a "full paradigm" (whatever that should refer to (?) --- but let's suppose, you have 6 forms (as per some textbook paradigms from some "Indo-European languages" --- 1st/2nd/3rd person in sg/pl), you surely haven't seen any of these forms combined with the verb before, have you? So where is your evidence that these forms exist in reality beyond that of your mind? And if such "perfect/ideal paradigm" exists only in your mind (and minds of some of your friends as well), how do you justify that morphological paradigma (the form/"structure"/pattern) are a necessary or intrinsic part of language (may these be of any particular language (which "one"?) or or language in general)? Wouldn't morphology as well as the perpetual construction and reconstruction of morphological patterns be a self-fulfilling prophecy only? And how often do we impose our conceptual/perceptual habits/categories upon whatever "new" that we encounter?
3. If, however, you were not able to construct a "full paradigm" or any part thereof at all, or you claim you were not able to think of a hypothetical verb either, because to you morphology is solely based on what has been written and analyzed beforehand/historically, then what is there to claim about morphological analyses? Not only does such practice not generalize, but it would also just apply to calcified segments analyzed/interpreted in a certain way as part of philological pursuits in the past. One should bear in mind that philological methods can progress and update as well.
There are no limits as to how one can *use* (or some might even claim *define* here) "language", including how various modalities can combine/fuse with each other. Meaning has no fixed boundaries. When it comes to language or meaning, there is no "completeness" to "speak of" or to serve as basis of any science/study. And there are no fixed demarcations between any "particular languages" either.
Other perspectives on (the shortcomings of) morphology and "words" can be found on my rebuttal page here: https://openreview.net/forum?id=-llS6TiOew. Please also read the references cited therein.
I look forward to your reply, comments/remarks, or questions. (Actually, the floor can also be opened to anyone who would like to join.)
Thank you and best
Ada
[View Less]